Chickasaw vs Croatian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Croatian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Croatians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,930
SOCIAL INDEX
86.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
37th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Croatian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,694,125 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Croatians.
Chickasaw vs Croatian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $108,383, a difference of 31.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $102,414, a difference of 31.4%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,742, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 6.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,662, a difference of 15.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,225, a difference of 17.7%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $47,742 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $111,370 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $90,685 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $49,724 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $59,715 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $40,993 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,662 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $102,414 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $108,383 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,225 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Tragic 29.0% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 48.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 47.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 13.8% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 14.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Average 12.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 3.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 30.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Good 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 41.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 77.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.10, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.10 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Exceptional 48.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.2% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.45%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 20.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 97.2% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 94.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 40.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chickasaw vs Croatian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 12.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 13.1%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Croatian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Fair 12.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Fair 5.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Good 11.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 21.8% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 45.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |