Fijian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,769,699 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.001% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 1,001.3 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,690 compared to $45,220, a difference of 23.3%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $55,712, a difference of 22.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $97,623, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $53,680, a difference of 7.1%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $64,416, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and family poverty (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.2%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.57%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.5%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 69.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 56.1%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.7%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.56%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.6%).