Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pueblo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pueblo

Immigrants from Oceania

Poor
Average
2,100
SOCIAL INDEX
18.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
270th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Pueblo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,026,669 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Pueblo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pueblo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pueblo corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from Oceania.
Pueblo Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($68,910 compared to $97,623, a difference of 41.7%), per capita income ($32,012 compared to $45,220, a difference of 41.3%), and median family income ($76,880 compared to $106,453, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,018 compared to $53,680, a difference of 19.2%), householder income over 65 years ($52,930 compared to $64,416, a difference of 21.7%), and median female earnings ($32,564 compared to $40,297, a difference of 23.7%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,012
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$76,880
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$64,692
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,859
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,314
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,564
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,018
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$68,910
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,601
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,930
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Average
25.6%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 121.4%), family poverty (17.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 94.4%), and receiving food stamps (19.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (37.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 29.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 36.3%), and single father poverty (21.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 36.8%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
19.4%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
18.5%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
20.7%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
26.9%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
22.2%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.7%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.9%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
23.5%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.6%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
37.2%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.1%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.2%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.9%
Good
11.4%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 63.9%), male unemployment (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
7.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.5%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
10.4%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.8%
Excellent
5.3%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (80.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
59.3%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
72.6%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.4%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.5%
Tragic
82.1%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (53.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 75.5%), single father households (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and currently married (38.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.1%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.5%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.0%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.79
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
38.2%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
53.7%
Excellent
30.6%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.4%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 5.6%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.6%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
7.6%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 46.3%), master's degree (10.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and associate's degree (34.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.13%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.2%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.5%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.3%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.4%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.0%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.5%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.3%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Good
1.9%

Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pueblo and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.4%), hearing disability (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 45.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.6%).
Pueblo vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricPuebloImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
14.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
15.0%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.3%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.1%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.9%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.5%