Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,100,202 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.316. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $45,220, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $55,712, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($90,907 compared to $89,100, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $40,297, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.0%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.9%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.6%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.19%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 45.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.12%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 3.7%).