Immigrants from Zaire vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,462,792 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Zaire communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zaire within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.231% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zaire corresponds to an increase of 230.7 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,045 compared to $97,623, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($71,801 compared to $89,100, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,207 compared to $103,705, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,017 compared to $40,297, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($41,325 compared to $47,617, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 26.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.4%), and single male poverty (13.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.9%), married-couple households (40.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.29, a difference of 2.3%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.5%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and college, under 1 year (64.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zaire and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and cognitive disability (19.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.50%), disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.5%).