Immigrants from Spain vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 185,421,176 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,933 compared to $45,220, a difference of 12.6%), median male earnings ($60,750 compared to $55,712, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($51,092 compared to $47,617, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.22%), householder income over 65 years ($63,540 compared to $64,416, a difference of 1.4%), and median household income ($92,732 compared to $89,100, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.24%), poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.9%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.82%), currently married (45.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.6%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.2%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%).