Slavic vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,790,490 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.717. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.021% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to an increase of 1,020.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,709 compared to $64,416, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,470 compared to $47,617, a difference of 0.31%), per capita income ($45,049 compared to $45,220, a difference of 0.38%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $103,705, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.0%), single father poverty (17.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.5%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.29%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.8%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%), married-couple households (47.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.2%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.41%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.0%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.9% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 0.30%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.46%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.050%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%).