Russian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,690,298 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.632. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 82.9 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $45,220, a difference of 17.5%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $55,712, a difference of 14.8%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $106,453, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $64,416, a difference of 5.0%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 18.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.90%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.6%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.6%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).