Jordanian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,096,318 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.189% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 188.5 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $103,705, a difference of 5.5%), median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $55,712, a difference of 5.0%), and wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.16%), per capita income ($45,605 compared to $45,220, a difference of 0.85%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $97,623, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.1%), receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.0%), and single female poverty (18.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.33%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.2%), births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.99%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.1%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.8%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and bachelor's degree (41.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.1%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.9%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.7%).