Scottish vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,167,481 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.571. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.209% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 209.0 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.2%), and median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $40,297, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,793 compared to $55,712, a difference of 0.15%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $103,705, a difference of 1.5%), and per capita income ($44,440 compared to $45,220, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.12%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.29, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.64%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 43.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.7%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.28%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.7%).