Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Russia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Russia

Immigrants from Oceania

Good
Average
7,989
SOCIAL INDEX
77.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
94th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Russia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 243,909,725 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 148.3 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Russia Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $45,220, a difference of 15.1%), median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $55,712, a difference of 13.7%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $47,617, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.15%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,044
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,942
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,378
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,457
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,326
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,680
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,891
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,751
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$113,215
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,512
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Average
25.6%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.030%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Good
8.7%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.5%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.4%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.58%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Females
Good
5.2%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.82%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.5%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
82.1%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (47.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households (63.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.7%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.1%
Excellent
30.6%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 55.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 28.9%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.1%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.3%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.3%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.2%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
97.9%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Good
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Good
97.6%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.9%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.7%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.1%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.4%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.4%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
1.9%

Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from RussiaImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.0%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Fair
2.5%