Mongolian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,291,402 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 41.2 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,173 compared to $45,220, a difference of 8.7%), median male earnings ($60,350 compared to $55,712, a difference of 8.3%), and median family income ($114,553 compared to $106,453, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $64,416, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $53,680, a difference of 2.2%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.4%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.22%), female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.61%), and poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.88%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 31.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.5%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.2%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).