Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,453,808 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.361. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,295 compared to $106,453, a difference of 20.6%), per capita income ($37,766 compared to $45,220, a difference of 19.7%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $55,712, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $40,297, a difference of 12.9%), and wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 40.1%), family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.8%), female unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 21.4%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.49%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.3%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.2%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.0%).