Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,511,170 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 16.6 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,096 compared to $64,416, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $103,705, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,657 compared to $47,617, a difference of 0.080%), per capita income ($44,509 compared to $45,220, a difference of 1.6%), and median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $40,297, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 16.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.5%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.16%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (42.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 30.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 22.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.0%), no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.5%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.9%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).