Immigrants from Iraq vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,888,721 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Iraq communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.310. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iraq within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iraq corresponds to a decrease of 9.3 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,365 compared to $45,220, a difference of 9.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,444 compared to $97,623, a difference of 9.1%), and median household income ($82,594 compared to $89,100, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,384 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.55%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,201 compared to $103,705, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.2%), single father poverty (14.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.57%), female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.96%), and poverty (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.39%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.080%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 0.96%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iraq and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.0%), female disability (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), male disability (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.0%).