Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,002,389 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.184. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 3.9 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,509 compared to $89,100, a difference of 21.2%), median family income ($88,717 compared to $106,453, a difference of 20.0%), and per capita income ($37,695 compared to $45,220, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $53,680, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $40,297, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 29.1%), family poverty (11.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 15.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.0%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.1%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.29, a difference of 1.5%), family households (63.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.24%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 31.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.0% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.23%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%).