Immigrants from Liberia vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,397,582 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Liberia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.193. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Liberia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Liberia corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 24.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,863 compared to $97,623, a difference of 20.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,967 compared to $64,416, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,970 compared to $40,297, a difference of 6.1%), median earnings ($42,923 compared to $47,617, a difference of 10.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,981 compared to $53,680, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 32.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.4%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.7%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple households (40.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.41%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.61%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 33.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (95.7% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Liberia and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.12%), male disability (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.3%).