Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,543,337 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.468. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 149.3 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,201 compared to $97,623, a difference of 7.8%), per capita income ($48,654 compared to $45,220, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($59,691 compared to $55,712, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $64,416, a difference of 0.55%), householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.4%), and wage/income gap (26.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.80%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.19%), married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 16.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.0%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and bachelor's degree (41.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%).