Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
Immigrants from Oceania
7,566
SOCIAL INDEX
73.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
113th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Belarus Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,270,719 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Belarus communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belarus within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belarus corresponds to a decrease of 42.2 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($62,658 compared to $55,712, a difference of 12.5%), median earnings ($53,043 compared to $47,617, a difference of 11.4%), and per capita income ($50,303 compared to $45,220, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.31%), householder income over 65 years ($62,162 compared to $64,416, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,743 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,303 | Excellent $45,220 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,586 | Excellent $106,453 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,399 | Exceptional $89,100 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,043 | Excellent $47,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $62,658 | Good $55,712 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $44,757 | Good $40,297 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,743 | Exceptional $53,680 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $107,393 | Excellent $97,623 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,430 | Excellent $103,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,162 | Exceptional $64,416 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.7% | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.3%), family poverty (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Good 8.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Excellent 12.8% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.5% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.0% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Good 11.5% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.43%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.98%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.0% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.4% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.95%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Good 65.2% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 33.4% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.0% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.2%), births to unmarried women (25.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
Family Households | Tragic 63.7% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.8% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.17 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.1% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 25.6% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 72.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 60.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 20.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 40.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.7% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 83.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 47.9% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.8%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 21.1%), and bachelor's degree (45.0% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.8% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Good 97.1% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Excellent 96.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Excellent 95.2% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.2% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.3% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.2% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.1% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.0% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.9% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.5% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Belarus vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belarus and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.50%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Belarus | Immigrants from Oceania |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |