South American Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,323,195 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within South American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.398% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South American Indians corresponds to an increase of 397.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.6%), householder income over 65 years ($62,215 compared to $64,416, a difference of 3.5%), and median family income ($103,624 compared to $106,453, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,019 compared to $40,297, a difference of 0.69%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,497 compared to $97,623, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,979 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.12%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.43%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 8.3%), bachelor's degree (39.3% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.9%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.78%).