Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Immigrants from Oceania
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,374,787 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.785. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 89.7 Immigrants from Oceania.
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $45,220, a difference of 42.5%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $89,100, a difference of 39.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $103,705, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,680, a difference of 14.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $40,297, a difference of 14.3%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $47,617, a difference of 23.0%).
Income Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Excellent $45,220 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Excellent $106,453 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Exceptional $89,100 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Excellent $47,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Good $55,712 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Good $40,297 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Exceptional $53,680 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Excellent $97,623 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Excellent $103,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Exceptional $64,416 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Average 25.6% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 96.1%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 90.3%), and single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 87.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 34.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 36.7%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Good 8.7% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Good 11.4% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 237.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 236.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 228.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 25.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Tragic 82.1% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.0%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 32.0%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.58%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 13.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Excellent 30.6% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 13.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 44.7%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.0%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.42%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.97%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Good 1.9% |
Crow vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.85%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Immigrants from Oceania |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Fair 2.5% |