Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Oceania
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,527,683 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 7.8 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $106,453, a difference of 22.1%), median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $55,712, a difference of 20.5%), and per capita income ($37,550 compared to $45,220, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.3%), median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $40,297, a difference of 13.7%), and wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 14.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Excellent $45,220 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Excellent $106,453 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Exceptional $89,100 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Excellent $47,617 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Good $55,712 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Good $40,297 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Exceptional $53,680 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Excellent $97,623 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Excellent $103,705 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Exceptional $64,416 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.2%), family poverty (12.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 36.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.7%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.9%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Average 12.3% |
| Families | Tragic 12.0% | Good 8.7% |
| Males | Tragic 14.0% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Tragic 17.0% | Average 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Average 13.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Good 16.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 15.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Good 20.7% |
| Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Good 28.7% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 10.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.4%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Average 5.3% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Poor 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Good 7.5% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 37.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 84.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.1%), births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.22%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Good 46.9% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Average 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Good 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 14.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 9.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Excellent 90.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Exceptional 57.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 21.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.5%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Poor 97.1% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 96.8% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Tragic 95.7% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Poor 94.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Poor 93.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Fair 88.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Fair 85.5% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Average 65.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Average 59.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Fair 45.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Fair 37.3% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Fair 14.7% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.6% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.2%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.87%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Fair 11.8% |
| Males | Good 11.0% | Fair 11.4% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Fair 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Poor 24.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Tragic 48.0% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Average 2.2% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Good 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Fair 2.5% |