Guamanian/Chamorro vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,853,387 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.693. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.271% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 270.7 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $45,220, a difference of 8.5%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $106,453, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $97,623, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $53,680, a difference of 0.48%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $64,416, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.62%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.5%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.0%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and female disability (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.6%).