Immigrants from Dominica vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,806,330 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Dominica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.433. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Dominica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.183% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Dominica corresponds to an increase of 183.0 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,071 compared to $64,416, a difference of 28.6%), wage/income gap (20.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 28.0%), and median family income ($85,411 compared to $106,453, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,825 compared to $40,297, a difference of 6.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,301 compared to $53,680, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($42,420 compared to $47,617, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 61.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 48.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and single female poverty (23.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 16.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 39.1%), births to unmarried women (39.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.81%), and family households (63.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 128.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 82.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 16.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (41.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 38.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 59.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 38.1%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.6%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Dominica and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.2%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (49.1% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (12.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.0%).