Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Immigrants from Oceania

Poor
Average
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,390,811 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 15.5 Immigrants from Oceania.
Lumbee Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $89,100, a difference of 63.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $97,623, a difference of 61.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $103,705, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 20.2%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $40,297, a difference of 24.0%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $47,617, a difference of 29.1%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Average
25.6%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 102.8%), receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 101.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 99.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 50.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 57.3%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 59.8%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Good
11.4%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 84.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 76.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 8.7%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Tragic
82.1%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 44.9%), and married-couple households (39.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.85%), family households (63.1% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Excellent
30.6%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.1%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 85.6%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 75.3%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.19%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.69%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.70%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Good
1.9%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.8%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Fair
2.5%