Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Brazilians

Immigrants from Oceania

Good
Average
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Brazilian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,545,855 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.291. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from Oceania.
Brazilian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $64,416, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $45,220, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($88,934 compared to $89,100, a difference of 0.19%), median family income ($106,942 compared to $106,453, a difference of 0.46%), and median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $40,297, a difference of 0.46%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,700
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,942
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$88,934
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,356
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,837
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,483
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,335
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$98,267
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,408
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,465
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Average
25.6%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Good
11.9%
Average
12.3%
Families
Excellent
8.6%
Good
8.7%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.6%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.4%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Good
11.4%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Good
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Excellent
5.3%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.7%
Tragic
82.1%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.2%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Average
12.1%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Excellent
30.6%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 41.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.39%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 7.0%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.8%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
7.6%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 12.8%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Fair
96.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Good
93.8%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.3%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Good
60.5%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Good
1.9%

Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.3%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
Brazilian vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricBrazilianImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Excellent
6.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.4%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Fair
2.5%