Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Oceania
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,893,659 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 71.1 Immigrants from Oceania.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $45,220, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.4%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $40,297, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $97,623, a difference of 0.26%), median household income ($89,496 compared to $89,100, a difference of 0.45%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $64,416, a difference of 1.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Excellent $45,220 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Excellent $106,453 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Exceptional $89,100 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Excellent $47,617 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Good $55,712 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Good $40,297 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Exceptional $53,680 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Excellent $97,623 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Excellent $103,705 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Exceptional $64,416 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Average 25.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.5%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.34%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Average 12.3% |
| Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Good 8.7% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Average 11.2% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Average 13.3% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Excellent 19.7% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Average 13.5% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Good 16.9% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Good 15.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Good 16.0% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Good 20.7% |
| Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Exceptional 15.4% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 28.7% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 5.0% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Excellent 10.4% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Good 11.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.0%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.57%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Excellent 17.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.4% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Poor 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Good 7.5% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Excellent 5.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Poor 79.3% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 37.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Exceptional 76.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 84.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 82.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.6%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.29, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.21%), currently married (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.29%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Good 46.9% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.29 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Average 6.3% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Average 46.5% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Good 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Excellent 30.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.16%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Excellent 9.7% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Excellent 90.4% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Exceptional 57.5% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Exceptional 21.8% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Poor 2.2% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.8% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.7% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 97.1% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Poor 96.8% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 95.7% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Poor 94.5% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Poor 93.4% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Fair 92.2% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Fair 90.9% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Fair 88.8% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Fair 85.5% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Average 65.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Average 59.4% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Fair 45.8% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Fair 37.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Fair 14.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 4.6% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Good 1.9% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.8%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.13%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Oceania |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 11.8% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Fair 11.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Fair 11.4% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Poor 24.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Average 2.2% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
| Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 17.6% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Good 6.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |