Malaysian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,304,241 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 4.5 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $45,220, a difference of 15.4%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $106,453, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $64,416, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $40,297, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.60%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.97%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.31 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.51%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (45.9% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 34.6%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.2%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.8%).