Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Immigrants from Oceania
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,367,065 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 36.2 Immigrants from Oceania.
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $45,220, a difference of 47.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $103,705, a difference of 41.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $89,100, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $40,297, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $97,623, a difference of 17.9%).
Income Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Excellent $45,220 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Excellent $106,453 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $89,100 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Excellent $47,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Good $55,712 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Good $40,297 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $53,680 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Excellent $97,623 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Excellent $103,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Exceptional $64,416 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Average 25.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 127.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 110.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 4.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 43.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Good 8.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Good 11.4% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 145.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 133.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 120.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 82.1% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 69.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 68.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Excellent 30.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 45.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 61.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.27%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.9% |
Pima vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 61.1%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.5%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Immigrants from Oceania |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.5% |