Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants from Oceania
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Oceania
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,623,113 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.626. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.122% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 121.8 Immigrants from Oceania.
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 50.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $103,705, a difference of 43.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $64,416, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $55,712, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $53,680, a difference of 21.0%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $47,617, a difference of 22.3%).
Income Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Excellent $45,220 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Excellent $106,453 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $89,100 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Excellent $47,617 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Good $55,712 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Good $40,297 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Exceptional $53,680 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Excellent $97,623 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Excellent $103,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $64,416 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Average 25.6% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 89.0%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 73.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 33.4%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Good 8.7% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Average 11.2% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Average 13.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Excellent 19.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Average 13.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Good 16.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Good 15.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Good 16.0% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Good 16.1% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Good 20.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Good 28.7% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Good 11.4% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 54.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Good 5.2% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Excellent 11.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Poor 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Excellent 5.3% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Poor 79.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 37.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 76.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Tragic 84.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Tragic 82.1% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 52.3%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Good 46.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.29 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Average 6.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Average 46.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Good 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Excellent 30.6% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 55.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 35.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Excellent 9.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Excellent 90.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 57.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 21.8% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 7.6% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 106.1%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 99.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 85.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.45%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Poor 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Poor 93.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Fair 92.2% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Fair 90.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Fair 88.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Fair 85.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Average 65.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Average 59.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Fair 37.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Fair 14.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Good 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Good 1.9% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 66.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 64.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 17.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.7%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Oceania |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Fair 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 11.4% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Fair 11.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Poor 24.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Tragic 48.0% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Average 2.2% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Good 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Fair 2.5% |