Estonian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,455,299 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to an increase of 76.8 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,875 compared to $45,220, a difference of 14.7%), median family income ($118,013 compared to $106,453, a difference of 10.9%), and median male earnings ($61,710 compared to $55,712, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $53,680, a difference of 4.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,926 compared to $64,416, a difference of 5.4%), and wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.6%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.59%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.9%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (62.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 20.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.040%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 32.4%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.44%), disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.1%).