Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cheyenne

Immigrants from Oceania

Poor
Average
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Cheyenne Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,095,010 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.897. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.797% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to an increase of 796.8 Immigrants from Oceania.
Cheyenne Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $103,705, a difference of 35.8%), median household income ($66,974 compared to $89,100, a difference of 33.0%), and median family income ($81,385 compared to $106,453, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.9%), median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $40,297, a difference of 13.0%), and median earnings ($40,233 compared to $47,617, a difference of 18.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,276
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$81,385
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,974
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,062
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,673
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,275
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,152
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,362
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,096
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Average
25.6%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 87.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 67.6%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 8.2%), receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 27.7%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
18.9%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
17.6%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
20.2%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.1%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
28.3%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.4%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.4%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.5%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.4%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Good
11.4%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 139.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 102.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 85.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.1%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
8.0%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.3%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.5%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.8%
Excellent
5.3%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.7%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.3%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.6%
Tragic
82.1%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 35.2%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.29, a difference of 5.6%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.3%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.47
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Excellent
30.6%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 5.9%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.6%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.6%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.16%), 9th grade (94.9% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and 11th grade (91.8% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.53%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.7%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.9%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 42.4%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (31.1% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
31.1%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%