British West Indian vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,334,088 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Immigrants from Oceania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 42.4%), householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $64,416, a difference of 25.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $103,705, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $40,297, a difference of 0.010%), householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $53,680, a difference of 3.5%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $47,617, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 57.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 7.3%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 39.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.6%), and male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 30.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.87%), family households (62.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 205.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 120.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 90.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 28.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 62.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 90.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.0%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 1.4%), disability (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%).