Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaire
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yakama

Immigrants from Oceania

Poor
Average
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Yakama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,964,715 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania within Yakama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yakama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Oceania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yakama corresponds to a decrease of 15.7 Immigrants from Oceania.
Yakama Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,009 compared to $45,220, a difference of 37.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,226 compared to $97,623, a difference of 28.1%), and median family income ($83,932 compared to $106,453, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,321 compared to $53,680, a difference of 1.2%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,234 compared to $64,416, a difference of 14.5%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Income
Income MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,009
Excellent
$45,220
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,932
Excellent
$106,453
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,225
Exceptional
$89,100
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,107
Excellent
$47,617
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,002
Good
$55,712
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,354
Good
$40,297
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,321
Exceptional
$53,680
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,226
Excellent
$97,623
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,992
Excellent
$103,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,234
Exceptional
$64,416
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Average
25.6%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 88.2%), married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 78.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 17.4%), single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 26.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Poverty
Poverty MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
Poverty
Tragic
16.7%
Average
12.3%
Families
Tragic
13.1%
Good
8.7%
Males
Tragic
15.3%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
18.0%
Average
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.3%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.1%
Good
15.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Good
16.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Males
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
28.3%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Good
28.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.0%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.8%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.3%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Good
11.4%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (18.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 105.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (8.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 90.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
Unemployment
Tragic
7.3%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
7.9%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
18.4%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (79.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 2.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.8%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.9%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
84.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.0%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Tragic
82.1%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.3%), single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 34.0%), and births to unmarried women (40.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.29, a difference of 4.7%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
Family Households
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.8%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Good
46.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.45
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.4%
Average
6.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.0%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
40.3%
Excellent
30.6%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 69.6%), no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 47.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.6% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (64.9% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (31.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 42.1%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.6%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
57.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
31.0%
Exceptional
21.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
12.9%
Exceptional
7.6%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.3%), master's degree (9.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 55.0%), and bachelor's degree (24.5% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.3%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Education Level
Education Level MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.6%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.6%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Poor
94.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
86.9%
Poor
93.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
85.0%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
82.5%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
80.0%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
74.5%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.6%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
46.2%
Average
59.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.3%
Fair
45.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.5%
Fair
37.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.5%
Fair
14.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.1%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.9%

Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yakama and Immigrants from Oceania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.6%), hearing disability (3.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (29.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (51.3% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Yakama vs Immigrants from Oceania Disability
Disability MetricYakamaImmigrants from Oceania
Disability
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
11.8%
Males
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
11.4%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.00%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.6%
Poor
24.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.3%
Tragic
48.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.8%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.5%