Eastern European vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 163,422,803 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Eastern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.789. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Eastern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.061% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Eastern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 61.3 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,780 compared to $35,546, a difference of 56.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($114,523 compared to $74,847, a difference of 53.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($120,684 compared to $78,960, a difference of 52.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.6%), householder income under 25 years ($54,066 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,470 compared to $51,949, a difference of 35.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 65.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 63.4%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 60.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.7%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 35.4%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.6%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 129.1%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 109.5%), and master's degree (21.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Eastern European and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 69.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 62.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.3%).