Hawaiian vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,312,537 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.318. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 4.9 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($84,729 compared to $67,715, a difference of 25.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $78,960, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $51,949, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $46,594, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $39,648, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 39.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 19.5%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 13.1%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.20, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.17%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 40.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.7%).