Uruguayan vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,378,136 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 151.9 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $74,847, a difference of 25.1%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $67,715, a difference of 25.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,660 compared to $78,960, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.9%), householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $51,949, a difference of 13.7%), and median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $46,594, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 43.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 42.1%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 10.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.1%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.47%), married-couple households (45.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 45.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.6%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 64.9%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 57.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.3%).