Immigrants vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,465,320 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,818 compared to $67,715, a difference of 26.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $78,960, a difference of 26.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $74,847, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.0%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $51,949, a difference of 14.8%), and median male earnings ($54,168 compared to $46,594, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 36.5%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.2% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.3%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.71%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 22.4%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 49.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 70.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 40.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 57.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 53.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.6%).