Lumbee vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,015,363 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $45,371, a difference of 31.2%), householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $51,949, a difference of 28.1%), and wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 27.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $33,437, a difference of 2.9%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $39,648, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $46,594, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 70.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (18.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 65.7%), and receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.9%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 28.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 72.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 54.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.5%), births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and bachelor's degree (24.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 4th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), female disability (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and male disability (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.0%).