Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Creek

Good
Fair
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,391,152 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Creek within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to a decrease of 5.4 Creek.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Creek Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $35,546, a difference of 32.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $74,847, a difference of 32.9%), and median family income ($107,502 compared to $82,560, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.51%), householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $45,371, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $51,949, a difference of 17.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
27.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 56.7%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 54.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.6%), single father poverty (18.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.2%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
77.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 24.1%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 0.96%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
37.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 37.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.4%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
7.2%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.3%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 67.9%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.28%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 46.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.8%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynCreek
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%