Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,610,617 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.327. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.099% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 98.5 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $35,546, a difference of 45.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $74,847, a difference of 42.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $78,960, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 0.53%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $45,371, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $51,949, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 63.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (16.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 32.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.0%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 76.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 69.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 58.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 12.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 20.3%).