Filipino vs Creek Community Comparison

COMPARE

Filipino
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Creek
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Filipinos

Creek

Exceptional
Fair
9,951
SOCIAL INDEX
97.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
5th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Creek Integration in Filipino Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,283,083 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Creek.
Filipino Integration in Creek Communities

Filipino vs Creek Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $74,847, a difference of 72.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $78,960, a difference of 70.9%), and median household income ($115,509 compared to $67,715, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $45,371, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($76,686 compared to $51,949, a difference of 47.6%).
Filipino vs Creek Income
Income MetricFilipinoCreek
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$59,066
Tragic
$35,546
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$138,397
Tragic
$82,560
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$115,509
Tragic
$67,715
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$61,197
Tragic
$39,648
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$74,224
Tragic
$46,594
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,508
Tragic
$33,437
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,740
Tragic
$45,371
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,723
Tragic
$74,847
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$134,910
Tragic
$78,960
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$76,686
Tragic
$51,949
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Tragic
27.1%

Filipino vs Creek Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 108.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 93.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 93.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 12.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 27.5%).
Filipino vs Creek Poverty
Poverty MetricFilipinoCreek
Poverty
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
17.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
19.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
24.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
21.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
27.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.3%
Tragic
36.7%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Average
10.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.4%
Tragic
14.1%

Filipino vs Creek Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 36.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Filipino vs Creek Unemployment
Unemployment MetricFilipinoCreek
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.9%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%

Filipino vs Creek Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 23.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 5.9%).
Filipino vs Creek Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricFilipinoCreek
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Tragic
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
39.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.4%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
77.7%

Filipino vs Creek Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 63.5%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 49.6%), and divorced or separated (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.060%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Filipino vs Creek Family Structure
Family Structure MetricFilipinoCreek
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Fair
64.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.0%
Tragic
45.3%
Average Family Size
Poor
3.20
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.7%
Poor
46.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
37.6%

Filipino vs Creek Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 33.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Filipino vs Creek Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricFilipinoCreek
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
58.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
7.2%

Filipino vs Creek Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 155.1%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 144.3%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 122.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.36%).
Filipino vs Creek Education Level
Education Level MetricFilipinoCreek
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.6%
Tragic
88.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.5%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
75.5%
Tragic
59.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
52.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
59.8%
Tragic
37.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
52.7%
Tragic
28.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
23.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.4%
Tragic
1.3%

Filipino vs Creek Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 109.8%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 90.2%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.6%).
Filipino vs Creek Disability
Disability MetricFilipinoCreek
Disability
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.5%
Females
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
15.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
16.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
51.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
4.4%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%