Crow vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,071,198 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.595. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.837% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 836.5 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 42.3%), per capita income ($31,729 compared to $35,546, a difference of 12.0%), and median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $46,594, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($38,707 compared to $39,648, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $45,371, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $74,847, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 54.9%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 52.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.3%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and single female poverty (32.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 263.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 260.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 197.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.1%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.20, a difference of 19.6%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.10%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 9.7%), college, 1 year or more (54.5% compared to 52.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 0.010%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 3.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.4%).