Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,122,071 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.429. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $78,960, a difference of 57.3%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $67,715, a difference of 56.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $74,847, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $45,371, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $51,949, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 82.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 78.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 72.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.2%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 52.2%), divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.91%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 13.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.89%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (20.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 97.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 95.2%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 90.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.26%), 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 90.6%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 79.5%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 69.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.3%).