Comanche vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,850,056 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.037% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 37.0 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $74,847, a difference of 9.8%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $67,715, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $78,960, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $46,594, a difference of 3.5%), median earnings ($41,519 compared to $39,648, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $45,371, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 16.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 2.5%), male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 6.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (63.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 31.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and vision disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.48%), self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.9%).