Pima vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,953,627 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 5.1 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 28.5%), per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,546, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,371, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,949, a difference of 2.8%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $39,648, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $33,437, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 106.6%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 84.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 81.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 5.2%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 119.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 100.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 60.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 81.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.58%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.1%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 24.4%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.8%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.9%), ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.8%).