Immigrants from Western Asia vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,618,892 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Immigrant from Western Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.105. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Western Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Western Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,217 compared to $78,960, a difference of 34.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,516 compared to $74,847, a difference of 33.0%), and median household income ($90,005 compared to $67,715, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,190 compared to $45,371, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,645 compared to $51,949, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 49.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 41.9%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 37.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 38.0%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 28.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 42.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 74.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 66.9%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Western Asia and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 62.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 57.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.5%).