Native/Alaskan vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 175,759,196 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.092. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 6.6 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 10.4%), per capita income ($33,279 compared to $35,546, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $45,371, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,879 compared to $67,715, a difference of 0.24%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $51,949, a difference of 0.25%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $74,847, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 34.1%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.16%), single female poverty (28.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 0.77%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.2%), births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (43.5% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 34.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.0%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and associate's degree (34.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.0%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and female disability (14.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.63%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).