Mongolian vs Creek Community Comparison
COMPARE
Mongolian
Creek
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Mongolians
Creek
8,008
SOCIAL INDEX
77.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
93rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,959
SOCIAL INDEX
27.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
237th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Creek Integration in Mongolian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,327,308 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Creek within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 20.0 Creek.
Mongolian vs Creek Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $78,960, a difference of 41.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,578 compared to $74,847, a difference of 39.7%), and median household income ($93,971 compared to $67,715, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $45,371, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $51,949, a difference of 25.8%).
Income Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $49,173 | Tragic $35,546 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,553 | Tragic $82,560 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,971 | Tragic $67,715 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,038 | Tragic $39,648 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $60,350 | Tragic $46,594 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,542 | Tragic $33,437 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Good $52,540 | Tragic $45,371 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,578 | Tragic $74,847 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,602 | Tragic $78,960 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,326 | Tragic $51,949 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Tragic 27.1% |
Mongolian vs Creek Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 50.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 49.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.75%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 12.1%).
Poverty Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
Poverty | Average 12.4% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Fair 11.3% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 17.0% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 24.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 19.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 24.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Tragic 21.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 21.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 21.7% |
Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 19.8% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 36.7% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Tragic 6.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 10.9% | Average 10.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Mongolian vs Creek Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.9% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Poor 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.9% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Mongolian vs Creek Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 61.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 79.9% | Tragic 75.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 39.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.3% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Tragic 77.7% |
Mongolian vs Creek Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 34.6%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.020%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.98%).
Family Structure Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Fair 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 45.3% |
Average Family Size | Poor 3.20 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Poor 46.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 37.6% |
Mongolian vs Creek Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 68.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 7.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 92.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 58.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.1% | Exceptional 21.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Mongolian vs Creek Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 104.9%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 98.2%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.0% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.30%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.9% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Exceptional 98.3% |
3rd Grade | Fair 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
4th Grade | Fair 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.9% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Exceptional 94.2% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Average 92.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.8% | Tragic 90.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 69.9% | Tragic 59.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 52.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.0% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.4% | Tragic 28.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 10.5% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 1.3% |
Mongolian vs Creek Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Creek communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 66.8%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.8%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.3%).
Disability Metric | Mongolian | Creek |
Disability | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 15.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 15.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 16.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 30.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.3% | Tragic 51.5% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 4.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.5% | Tragic 8.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.8% |