Polish vs Creek Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,132,942 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Creek within Polish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Poles within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Creek. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Poles corresponds to a decrease of 0.7 Creek.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,952 compared to $78,960, a difference of 34.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,685 compared to $74,847, a difference of 33.2%), and median family income ($108,507 compared to $82,560, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 5.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,407 compared to $45,371, a difference of 15.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,598 compared to $51,949, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 56.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 54.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 22.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.6% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.1%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.9%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.67%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 47.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Polish and Creek communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 48.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 13.5%).